![]() |
||
Page loaded Friday, May 16, 5:33pm AEDT |
Ibrahim's mattress - 10 days oldHappy bday, Owen. If you're back in Melbourne around Sept, don't be surprised to see a flyer, featuring a fetus being harrassed by a dildo, doing the rounds. I advocate disinterested neutrality regarding the rights and wrongs of Tibet and China, and disdain for attention-seeking hippie types. I've my leftist leanings, but the sadist in me roots for the riot police. If you sport grubby-looking dreadlocks, you deserve to be brained for trafficking head lice. Tuesday, May 6, 10.55pm - Au Revoir Dogto start again - 2 weeks oldDon, perhaps you should try it and find out... just make sure you can claim it as a derivative work to avoid the original's copyright. I'm a relative newcomer to the China vs. Tibet debate. I've seen the Tibet romanticised in the film Kundun, picked on by China. I've seen the same point made much more succinctly in The Simpsons. But apart from a lefty gut feeling that supporting the underdog is probably a good idea, I don't think I'm informed enough to support either side. I certainly haven't been paying attention to the news (except when my friends are in it). Are we going to forget all this once the Olympic Games are over? After they've begun? And paragliding... yes, go for it, but be prepared: floating through the air is not exactly a fast-paced adventure sport. One day I'd like to spend enough time training to be able to fly solo. Tuesday, April 29, 11.41pm - TalonTest Case - 3 weeks oldIf I draw a dildo on an ultrasound, should I face child pornography charges? Tuesday, April 22, 10.36pm - Au Revoir Dogoh, now i remember. SUN MICROSYSTEMS is huge - 5 weeks oldHow huge? They have several call centers around the world just to handle internal IT. Saturday, April 12, 6.41pm - pentoFloat like an interest rate, sting like a fee. George will sign what his eyes can't see. - 5 weeks oldIndeed, there are two sides, although it won't be apparent in the Western media. Further random points: - The IOC would have been very naive to think human rights would improve in China because Beijing was awarded the Olympics on such a condition. - No one has ever invaded territory with the noble intention of liberating people. An army would never play Good Samaritan. - If Tibet were richer, they might be recognised as an independent country. - In disputes over land, might is right. - If I were an athlete, I'd say, "Fuck Tibet. I didn't pick the location of the Games, but I did put in years of training to compete". - Western sympathisers with the Tibetan cause are mostly just there for the ride. - The Olympics, like Christmas, should be an occasion to sweep the failings of mankind under the rug. - The CCP is an equal opportunity oppressor. Other Chinese dissidents would be ruing the fact that to cry "Free China" would sound like an insult to sovereignty, whereas "Free Tibet" somehow sounds like a legitimate cause. - Condemnation of the CCP's treatment of its people is in part an expression of fear about Communist China's growing military and economic power. - If China is to be boycotted, it shouldn't just be for the Olympics. If feeling is strong enough regarding human rights, governments should impose economic sanctions too a la South Africa. Why should athletes solely be subject to a question of conscience and not private firms? Pragmatism has gone unquestioned so far, why suspend it for two weeks in August? - As compelling as Olympic competition can be, I'd have much more fun watching a world event where nations suspend all sport for two weeks and compete in matters of virtue. Friday, April 11, 2.36pm - Au Revoir Dogregardless of my excessive anger, i remain a restricted rodent - 5 weeks oldWell, I have lived out the dream of every angsty middle-class teen from the mid-90's who couldn't save up their pocket money. I saw The Smashing Pumpkins live. Admittedly I didn't pay money for it, the folks organising V Festival were pretty eager to give away the tickets. It was good to see that Billy hadn't gotten any less pretentious in his old age. Don, welcome to the world of international politics. There is always 2 (usually more) sides to any story, Tibet being no exception. A few things to note, in no particular order: I agree, though. It does come down to a shit-fight, for the most part. In other news, I got a copy of Ghosts by Nine Inch Nails (just to get back to the angsty mid-90's teen theme). I've been enjoying it immensely. Thursday, April 10, 8.40pm - pentoPsst... want the dirt on the Dalai Lama? - 5 weeks oldI was recently given the Chinese perspective on Tibet. It was hard to believe at first, but given the claims made, I thought I should at least google it. This, among other materials came as a rude shock: http://www.michaelparenti.org/Tibet.html Before China "invaded" Tibet, the country was a serfdom. Far from being a land of freedom and enlightenment, most people in Tibet lived as either serfs or slaves, with religion and notions of karma playing a role in their oppression. This caused be to raise some questions: Would people be so keen to free Tibet if: I used to think that the Tibetan issue was one of liberation (not that I particularly cared about the oppression of Tibet over and above that of any other people), but now it just seems to be just another shitfight over land and power. Thursday, April 10, 4.43pm - Au Revoir Dog... - 8 weeks oldhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/drayla/page9/ re jphone, yeah ive always been frustrated with the phones they had on offer say at softbank, 'same same but different', japanese handheld phones' standing in the global marketplace makes plenty of sense... re japanese keitai consumers (note: generalisation)...more focus on presentation and various gimmicks plus acceptance of stat quo re functions (what is really key to me) perhaps? Wednesday, March 19, 2.24am - woz in translationparagliding - 8 weeks oldhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/drayla/page9/ Wednesday, March 19, 2.21am - woz in translation |